UN Rapporteur on Psychological Torture

Nils Melzer on Julian Assange.


He says  UK that the UK and US governments are obliged to investigate.

Investigate this too: Message For Porter J. Goss:


Then, how about investigating psychological torture of entire populations in countries like Vietnam, Yemen, Bolivia, East Timor, Rohingya, India and Papua New Guinea?


And how about investigating the deaths of people in the UK and the US who were working on secure communications so we could have effective international human rights representatives?

And how about getting this woman calling herself Moira (ask at the British Embassy in La Paz, because since October 2019 she has made me sign receipts on FCO official letterhead, each month when she gives me US$120)  to reassure me that this sort of thing isn't going on right here in Cochabamba? Because I have no way of knowing. Nobody will speak to me. Not even the UN Human Rights people who came here a couple of months ago.


See also Costa Rica and Guns and War Crimes.

Here's a video I made about what my life here is like.


See also this:


And MAS Demonstrations In Support of Evo Morales.

I also have problems with faces. Look at this picture from the C4 video above:


Compare that with this picture:


From this Arabic version of this (which I can't listen to because of the ridiculously high-level amplification of high-frequency components that makes it physically painful to hear):


And this screenshot from the C4 video:


To me, it looks like that C4 video has been set up to send a message to any women here who support me. What do you think? See Jaques Brel for the relevance of this.

Let's start talking about the real issue here, Mr Melzer.

Amen!

See:
And:

See also One Slip.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Stefan Molyneux on Resource Based Economy

Image
This is an interesting discussion. What most people don't realise is that capitalism as we practice it now wastes 99.9% of the human and material resources we currently use. Once you realise that, the problems raised by the idea of gift or resource-based economies become much more tractable. At  10 minutes 30 seconds  the discussion turns to the way we treat our family and friends differently. We don't charge our nearest and dearest. At this point Molyneux brings in Neo-Darwinian evolution to explain why there is this difference between the way we treat our kith and kin to the way we treat everybody else. I guess he will go on to argue that this is because we evolved to be like this, otherwise we would not have survived. He will presumably say that this is human nature and because it is genetically determined, nothing we can do short of a programme of eugenics and euthenasia will change that. Well, ... you know what my answer to that will be, ... something along the lines:
Read more

Nikola Tesla and the End of The World

Image
At  1 minute 21 seconds  the building in the background, in Trafalgar Square , as she says "There is a story in our family that my great grandfather worked with Nikola Tesla, ..." is ... ... what? Hint: it is near to a statue of George Washington, a replica donated by the  Commonwealth of Virginia in 1921 .  See  War Crimes . Watch all four episodes of  Nikola Tesla and the End of The World  and then watch this: And on the meaning of the word sovereignty see: On the Mason-Dixon Line, the "boundary of slavery" in the American colonies, it might be insightful to compare the  Britannica  and  Wikipedia  entries and see where they differ. Then, especially if you're my daughter, see  On Feminist Genealogy . Then see this documentary about Mark Knopfler and what motivates his music. There's a nice bit at  17 minutes  about where songs come from, and what happens to their origin, and the role of Town Planners like my father, in this process, part
Read more

Sabine Hossenfelder - Lost in Math

Image
Sabine's book,  Lost in Math published in 2018. See  Rebecca Smethurst on the Crisis in Cosmology . Here's an interview on the subject of the book: At 16 minutes 27 seconds on aesthetics in a theory. I think you should worry first and foremost about whether or not it works, otherwise you are not doing empirical science. At 19 minutes 19 seconds on whether there would be better ways to advance physics other than by building the next generation of super high-energy particle collider. This is similar to military spending and it's really just an artefact of Keynesian monetary theory: that you can create 'wealth' by employing men to dig holes in the road and fill them up again. Of course you are not creating real wealth, you are destroying it and creating fake money. The upshot is that the better ways of spending much, much less money on encouraging sound scientific teaching and research are not of any interest, because they don't employ nearly so ma
Read more