Tim Palmer - Greenhouse Blues

Great song! See The Right Way to Formalise Mathematics.


Perimeter Blues. More research and less hot air please! (skip to 3 minutes 6 seconds, unless you enjoy nauseating introductions)


At 48 minutes 24 seconds on power requirements and data representation, see Ben Eater on Running a Breadboard at 1MHz and The Right Way to Formalise Mathematics.

At 1 hour 1 minute 48 seconds on the question as to whether we should cut our emissions of greenhouse gas being outside the scope of physical science. This is no use, because there is no science which has this within its scope. What we need is a knowledge-based economy. See Economic and Technological Development of La Madre Tierra.

The reason Tim Palmer's abdication of responsibility for deciding what action we should take is useless is that if the climate models are to be any use at all beyond generating uninformed 'debate', then those models are going to have to include the effects of future human actions.  For example, they need to include the effects of high-altitude water vapour emissions from long-haul jet airliner traffic. They also need to include the effects of nutrient runoff into rivers and oceans and those of topsoil erosion. On soil carbon, see:


... and:


Maintaining soils is crucial to prevent catastrophic flooding:


On the effects of nutrient runoff, see:


But that is only the beginning. We also need to model how ecosystems react to climate change, because this dramatically impacts soil erosion and nutrient runoff. And a part of this will modelling how human ecology adapts to changing climate:


We also need to understand how human communities change as a result of land management changes:


These things can be modelled. See this talk by Roderick Dewar:


At 47 minutes 14 seconds on functional isomorphisms between ecological systems and particle physics, see How Viruses Work and John Horton Conway.

For more on how large-scale models can accurately model global parameters in spite of chaotic dynamics, see this paper by Dewar: 4 Maximum Entropy Production and Non-equilibrium Statistical Mechanics.

We also need to be able to model all the new metabolic pathways we discover, to understand how they are coupled with the climate. For example:


See Mitochondria Batteries and:


This deep sub-terranean micro-biome will turn out to be geologically important, and we need to be able to include geological activity in climate models:


... volcanoes on land ...


... and in the oceans:


Now as to the question of what we should do, ... you would think the big money would be interested in knowing the answer:


It is fairly clear that our first and most immediate priority should be to find a way to make rational decisions about what scientific research we do, what data we need to collect and what systems we need to make the best use of that research and data. See Rebecca Smethurst on the Crisis in Cosmology and On Progressive and Degenerative Research Programs.

We need telecommunications systems to do this:


At 31 minutes 42 seconds, on correlation between early language development and senile dementia, see John Searle on Philosophy of Language, Particularly this observation of Wittgenstein's at 4 minutes 57 seconds and The Last Word on Love.

This post brought to you by Tim Palmer and the ...


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Stefan Molyneux on Resource Based Economy

Image
This is an interesting discussion. What most people don't realise is that capitalism as we practice it now wastes 99.9% of the human and material resources we currently use. Once you realise that, the problems raised by the idea of gift or resource-based economies become much more tractable. At  10 minutes 30 seconds  the discussion turns to the way we treat our family and friends differently. We don't charge our nearest and dearest. At this point Molyneux brings in Neo-Darwinian evolution to explain why there is this difference between the way we treat our kith and kin to the way we treat everybody else. I guess he will go on to argue that this is because we evolved to be like this, otherwise we would not have survived. He will presumably say that this is human nature and because it is genetically determined, nothing we can do short of a programme of eugenics and euthenasia will change that. Well, ... you know what my answer to that will be, ... something along the lines:
Read more

Nikola Tesla and the End of The World

Image
At  1 minute 21 seconds  the building in the background, in Trafalgar Square , as she says "There is a story in our family that my great grandfather worked with Nikola Tesla, ..." is ... ... what? Hint: it is near to a statue of George Washington, a replica donated by the  Commonwealth of Virginia in 1921 .  See  War Crimes . Watch all four episodes of  Nikola Tesla and the End of The World  and then watch this: And on the meaning of the word sovereignty see: On the Mason-Dixon Line, the "boundary of slavery" in the American colonies, it might be insightful to compare the  Britannica  and  Wikipedia  entries and see where they differ. Then, especially if you're my daughter, see  On Feminist Genealogy . Then see this documentary about Mark Knopfler and what motivates his music. There's a nice bit at  17 minutes  about where songs come from, and what happens to their origin, and the role of Town Planners like my father, in this process, part
Read more

Sabine Hossenfelder - Lost in Math

Image
Sabine's book,  Lost in Math published in 2018. See  Rebecca Smethurst on the Crisis in Cosmology . Here's an interview on the subject of the book: At 16 minutes 27 seconds on aesthetics in a theory. I think you should worry first and foremost about whether or not it works, otherwise you are not doing empirical science. At 19 minutes 19 seconds on whether there would be better ways to advance physics other than by building the next generation of super high-energy particle collider. This is similar to military spending and it's really just an artefact of Keynesian monetary theory: that you can create 'wealth' by employing men to dig holes in the road and fill them up again. Of course you are not creating real wealth, you are destroying it and creating fake money. The upshot is that the better ways of spending much, much less money on encouraging sound scientific teaching and research are not of any interest, because they don't employ nearly so ma
Read more