Irreducible Scientific Phenomena
Based on the text description and the first one minute four seconds, this looks promising. See Relational Semantics subtitled "The Evils of Lego" for my thoughts on this.
And on the implications of this as regards reasoning about the world using probability, see Julia Galef on Aumann's Agreement Theorem.
On Fodor's argument, at 16 minutes, concerning physical realisations of representation and interpretation, see Julian Barbour Making Sense of Information.
At 10 minutes 42 seconds Kuhns says "Everyone signs on to weak emergence... but strong emergence ... is a radical new thing." It is implicit in the works of Aristotle. See the first chapter of his Physics. We move from what is better known to us, to what is better known in itself. See The Works of Aristotle on Page 1
To see what this really means, try and outline the underlying cause in terms only of microscopic dynamics and fundamental particles, of these twenty experiments:
And on the implications of this as regards reasoning about the world using probability, see Julia Galef on Aumann's Agreement Theorem.
On Fodor's argument, at 16 minutes, concerning physical realisations of representation and interpretation, see Julian Barbour Making Sense of Information.
At 10 minutes 42 seconds Kuhns says "Everyone signs on to weak emergence... but strong emergence ... is a radical new thing." It is implicit in the works of Aristotle. See the first chapter of his Physics. We move from what is better known to us, to what is better known in itself. See The Works of Aristotle on Page 1
To see what this really means, try and outline the underlying cause in terms only of microscopic dynamics and fundamental particles, of these twenty experiments:
Comments
Post a Comment